Summation has received more industry accolades than any product in its category. Honors include:

 

---

2005

	TechnoLawyer Winner of the Favorite Litigation ASP "@" Award - CaseVault
	TechnoLawyer Finalist for Favorite Electronic Discovery Solution, Favorite Litigation Support Solution, and Favorite Transcript Management Solution - Summation Blaze/iBlaze

 

---

2004

	2nd Annual Law Technology News Awards Litigation Support Software - Summation Product of the Year - Summation iBlaze
	LawNet Technology Survey #1 Litigation Tool 5th Consecutive Year #1 in Transcript Management 3rd Consecutive year See excerpt.
	Law Office Computing 2004 Winner for Transcript Management.
	Law Office Computing 2004 Winner for Litigation Support.
	Law Office Computing 2004 Winner for Database Management.

 

---

2003

	LawNet Technology Survey Summation #1 for 4th year in a row! See excerpt.
	AmLaw Tech Survey Summation #1 in For 5th Year In A Row!
	TechnoLawyer Winner of the "@" Award for Favorite Electronic Discovery Solution.
	TechnoLawyer Finalist for Favorite Litigation Support Solution, Favorite Transcript Management Solution, and Favorite Practice Area Solution. CaseVault™, Summation's litigation support hosting service, was a finalist for the TechnoLawyer @ Award for Favorite Litigation ASP (Application Service Provider).
	Legal Assistant Today Voted the most widely used Litigation Support Software.
	Law Office Computing 2003 Finalist for Litigation Support.

---

2002

	LawNet Technology Survey Summation #1 for 3rd year in a row! See excerpt.
	AmLaw Tech Survey Summation #1 in For 4th Year In A Row!
	TechnoLawyer Winner of the "@" Award for Favorite Litigation Support Software.
	Electronic Lawyer Award Excellence in the field of Best of Breed for Software and Hardware.
	Law Office Computing 2002 Finalist for Litigation Support.

---

2001

	Law Office Computing Readers' Choice Award for Litigation Support.
	AmLaw Tech Survey Summation #1 in For 3rd Year In A Row!
	Legal Assistant Today For the third year in a row Summation was voted the most widely used Litigation Support Software by a margin of more than 300%.
	TechnoLawyer Finalist of the "@" Award for Favorite Litigation Support Software.

---

2000

	AMLAW Tech Survey Once again voted the #1 software for searching and retrieving litigation documents by America's top 100 law firms.
	Law Office Computing Readers' Choice Award for Litigation Support.
	Legal Assistant Today For the second year in a row Summation was voted the most widely used Litigation Support Software.
	TechnoLawyer Winner, for the second straight year, of the "@" Award for Favorite Litigation Support Software.

---

1999

	AMLAW Tech Survey Voted the #1 software for searching and retrieving litigation documents by America's top 100 law firms.
	Law Office Computing Readers' Choice Awards for Litigation Support.
	TechnoLawyer Winner of the "@" Award for Favorite Litigation Support Software.
	Legal Assistant Today Recognition as "Favorite Litigaton Support Software" by the readers.

---

1996-1998

	Law Office Computing Readers' Choice Award for Litigation Support Software (1998).
	Law Office Computing Readers' Choice Award for Litigation Support Software (1996).
	Law Office Computing Readers' Choice Award for Litigation Support Software (1997).
	Law Technology Product News 1998 Top 20 Reader's Interest Award.
	AMLAW TECH Recognition as the most highly used litigation support software in America's leading corporations, according to AMLAW TECH magazine's 1998 Corporate Technology Survey
	ABA Legal Technology Center Recognition as the most highly used litigation support software in America's largest law firms in the 1997 and 1998 ABA Legal Technology Center Surveys. Of the respondents, 46.7% named Summation as their litigation support software of choice (a greater market share than the next three packages combined!)

Summation is regularly used for cases with over a million document pages, including the nationwide breast implant litigation, and many high-profile employment, securities, anti-trust, and toxic tort actions. It's also used by plaintiff and defense counsel in thousands of smaller cases everyday ( cases where counsel's time and resource constraints make a rapid review of evidence, and maximum return on deposition investment, essential).